I Can't Believe It's BULLSHIT

SoupNazzi

Shared on Mon, 03/31/2008 - 13:52


Guess what?  It isn't butter, but it still isn't healthy for you!

I listen to Adam Carolla via Podcasts during the day, and last week, he had Jillian Michaels> from The Biggest Loser on his show. She divulged a few key things I hadn't heard or known.

When I changed my eating lifestyle years ago, I adopted ICBINB to substitute for margarine.  I thought it was the coolest thing that it was ZERO fat and ZERO calories.

Well, Jillian was discussing the use of this spray and she divulged that even though it says that, ONE bottle of this spray actually contains 900 calories and appx. 90 grams of fat!

WTF?!?!?!

Serving Size:    1.25 Sprays(0.25g) For Cooking Spray, 5 Sprays(1g) For Topping Spray.
Servings Per Container:    904 For Cooking Spray, 226 For Topping Spray.
Calories    0
Calories From Fat:    0
 
Amount Per Serving    % Daily Value***
 
Total Fat:    0g    0%
Saturated Fat:    0g    0%
Cholesterol:    0mg    0%
Sodium:    0mg**    0%
Total Carbohydrate:    0g    0%
Protein:    0g
Trans Fat:    0g
Polyunsaturated Fat:    0g
Monounsaturated Fat:    0g
Vitamin A:    0%

Not a significant source of dietary fiber, sugars, vitamin C, calcium and iron.
 
*0g fat, 0g saturated fat per serving
**When used as a topping, the amount of sodium per serving is 15mg / 1% of DV.

Key words:  Per Serving

Here's the skinny.  The FDA has a regulation that allows companies to label foods with servings that are 0.9 calories and 0.9 fat, they are allowed to round DOWN.  So, if each spray of ICBINB is (1) serving, and each serving is 0.9 calories and appx. 0.5 grams of fat, they can say that each serving is ZERO calories and ZERO fat.

I never really thought about this until she talked about it, and then she said that the spray contains liquid soy bean oil and sweet cream buttermilk.  Both of those contain calories and fat.

So basically, ICBINB is using this loop-hole to promote their product.  Nothing new in America.

Wheat Bread

Another interesting item that Jillian brought up is that wheat bread isn't very good for men.  Why?  Cause wheat releases estrogen in your body.  That's something guys really don't want or need.

Stick to 100% Whole Grain.  Much better stuff for ya.

Comments

Cranefolder's picture
Submitted by Cranefolder on Mon, 03/31/2008 - 17:32
Soup, I feel you on this. A related thing that you see EVERYFUCKINGWHERE right now on food packaging is "0 grams Trans fat". It's the same thing, they are actually allowed to round down if there is less than .5 grams per serving and of course they get around that by making the serving sizes appropriate for hamsters. The only way to know for sure that something has no trans fat is to buy something that says "Trans Fat Free" (and really, even that may have trace amounts). Check out the book "Fat Land", it will greatly reduce your confidence in the FDA. I'm about to start just growing my own food because those fuckers sold out to Corporate America a long time ago and nobody is minding the store.
BCKinetic's picture
Submitted by BCKinetic on Mon, 03/31/2008 - 13:56
Dude, I would just stay away from all that chemical crap anyways. Just use natural butter - just use it sparingly. I would rather have a some fat and calories from a natural source, that my body is familiar with, than put lab made chemical shit that wasn't intended for my body. Let's just remember Olestra shall we....
ATC_1982's picture
Submitted by ATC_1982 on Mon, 03/31/2008 - 13:58
I like White wheat or honey grain. Whole grain in a blue moon though.
d0od's picture
Submitted by d0od on Mon, 03/31/2008 - 14:01
Cooking spray is the same way.
MikeTheKnife's picture
Submitted by MikeTheKnife on Mon, 03/31/2008 - 14:36
Is it just the spray shit, or is the same way for the spread?
codemonkey's picture
Submitted by codemonkey on Mon, 03/31/2008 - 14:46
I dont see the big deal. It's..what? A calorie? 2? 4? I'm not concerned about a spray butter 'lying' by rounding down, especially when NOBODY should be drinking a full bottle at a time. Effectively, it's as close to zero as it takes to be good enough for me. Actually, I thought most people knew that it's has something in it, just not enough to matter. Many folks in America need to cut down on a lot more calories before they have to be sticklers about 1 or 2 in a serving. Too many people eating big macs with biggie fries along side a milk shake and some desert. We should get the word out "stop feeding your kids shit food or they'll grow up on it" and less about "omgzorz, a calorie"
SoupNazzi's picture
Submitted by SoupNazzi on Mon, 03/31/2008 - 14:52
It's a slippery slope... first it's one thing that the FDA allows, and soon its another and another and another to the point where the consumer's best interest is ignored for company's best interests.
SoupNazzi's picture
Submitted by SoupNazzi on Mon, 03/31/2008 - 14:53
It's not so much "omgzorz a calorie" it's the principle of the matter.
Mr_Duke_Togo's picture
Submitted by Mr_Duke_Togo on Mon, 03/31/2008 - 14:53
I actually heard that on an episode of Good Eats the other day. That Alton Brown is a freaking genius!!!
codemonkey's picture
Submitted by codemonkey on Mon, 03/31/2008 - 15:01
I guess I just don't see the issue with rounding down a floating point value, it's done in tons of industries. Just as I don't see the issue with forcing them to round up if need be. I'm highly confident this isn't the only "rounding" style errors that occur and the FDA lets pass. First, it would be neat if they could force grocery stores to honor the dates on meats and not get away with re-labeling and all that stuff, than an off-by-one issue. Better chance of bad things going down eating old meat than gaining wait for a calorie. While you're there, force the computer industry to advertise hard disks for their actual value. They're lying too, 320GB isn't really 320GB, it's 320,000,000 kilobytes, but a k is really 1024 not 1000 and they're cropping off the 24 bytes we're not getting in order to make it 320gb and not the real value.
SoupNazzi's picture
Submitted by SoupNazzi on Mon, 03/31/2008 - 15:13
I'm not buying a computer Hard drive for my health. I'm being told that this "spray" is 0 fat and 0 calories. It's advertised as such. Yet, it is actually 900 calories in the bottle an 90 grams of fat. How is that healthy for me? And it's not just one calorie. Have you ever only just sprayed your toast just "once"??? I doubt it. Or sprayed your potato just "once"??? Or your popcorn just "once"??? I want truth in advertising for things I am buying, especially when they relate to my health. I could give a shit about the computer hard-drive. You're comparing apples and oranges.
TDrag27's picture
Submitted by TDrag27 on Mon, 03/31/2008 - 15:16
I'm confused on the bread part. "Whole Grain" just means the grain in the flour that the bread is made from stays intact. The bran is not separated from the germ and endosperm. Wheat is a grain, that can be made into bread whole grain, or not whole grain. Is she saying that "wheat" specifically as a grain is bad? Or that non-whole grain whether it be wheat, oat, or any other grain is bad for men?
SoupNazzi's picture
Submitted by SoupNazzi on Mon, 03/31/2008 - 15:23
Listen to the file and decide for yourself... sorry, don't have time to go back myself :( http://podcast.971freefm.com/klsx1/985418.mp3
codemonkey's picture
Submitted by codemonkey on Mon, 03/31/2008 - 15:24
Actually, yes. I spray my toast once per piece, so maybe twice. Even if I spray them each 3 times (which I'd call overkill) that's what? 6 calories (rounding up of course)? Meh. I bet I drop at least half that .9 calories on the table trying to keep the spray landing on the food. I don't spray potatoes, and definitely not popcorn. I just don't consider 1 calorie or even 10 something that's going to cause my health to degrade. Now, if you wanna argue chemicals in there, I can't argue...as I don't know much about chemicals, I'm no chemist.

Join our Universe

Connect with 2o2p