Public Health Question

Devonsangel

Shared on Tue, 03/06/2007 - 13:49
I had a class not that long ago where the question was raised, "If you had to pay for health care based on your health habits (good or bad) would you be more inclined to take better care of yourself?" For instance, if you were a smoker, would you continue smoking if the cost of your health care would increase? Or if you were overweight would you be motivated to exercise and eat right?

I have mixed feelings about this because I'm such a big proponent of personal responsibility. Now this does not include situations or diseases that may be unavoidable. On one hand, I have a tough time reconciling paying for a person who has emphysema because of decades of smoking and choosing not to quit, or is morbidly obese (not genetic or metabolically based causes) because they like the taste of twinkies and Big Macs.

On the other hand, people are stricken with disease and there is no cause and effect to that disease and they need help.

Any thoughts?

EDIT: Capn asked some good questions and I see I need to clarify a little more.  The situations would be related more to health situations that derive from someone not taking care of themselves. Now I know this is a bad example, but I can't think of a different one right now. Diabetes brought on by obesity. I'm not referring to eating habits per se, but the direct consequences of those habits/actions. Would you feel it is fair to pay the same amount as someone who is going to need extensive care because of those actions as opposed to someone else who takes care of themselves? Did that muddy the water more? This is not an easy question.

Keep on Go!

Comments

Kwazy's picture
Submitted by Kwazy on Tue, 03/06/2007 - 16:14
This is one of my favorite topics. Lifestyle choices should absolutely factor into the cost of healthcare; whether it be personal, government, or company provided. If it were up to me, I'd tax people based on body fat percentage. You want to be morbidly obese, so be it....just pay your 15% premium. I'm an full organ donor. I wish there was some way I could stipulate that, for example, my lungs and heart go to a couple of kids with congenital defects versus some 300lb douche who's been chain-smoking for 40 years. Now THERE'S freedom of choice for you!
CapnHun's picture
Submitted by CapnHun on Tue, 03/06/2007 - 14:08
Are you talking in a universal health care plan? Or an employeers health care plan where you would pay more because you smoked than the person in the cubical next to you who didn't? And are you talking about healthy eating decisions based on food or weight alone? Cause I have met plenty of skinny people who seem to live on candy bars & mountain dew. How would you moniter that without being extremly invasive to a persons privacy? Aren't their already caps on health insurance so for example if someone develops lung cancer for smoking there is only so much the insurance will pay (depending on the policy)?
CapnHun's picture
Submitted by CapnHun on Tue, 03/06/2007 - 14:08
Are you talking in a universal health care plan? Or an employeers health care plan where you would pay more because you smoked than the person in the cubical next to you who didn't? And are you talking about healthy eating decisions based on food or weight alone? Cause I have met plenty of skinny people who seem to live on candy bars & mountain dew. How would you moniter that without being extremly invasive to a persons privacy? Aren't their already caps on health insurance so for example if someone develops lung cancer for smoking there is only so much the insurance will pay (depending on the policy)?
Devonsangel's picture
Submitted by Devonsangel on Tue, 03/06/2007 - 14:11
No, not an employers health care plan. Hmm, not sure how I would describe this. As for weight, it would be more related to obesity related diseases like diabetes or such, not just eating habits. I'll edit the original blog to try and clarify.
CofC's picture
Submitted by CofC on Tue, 03/06/2007 - 14:16
In life insurance, they already rate you for smoking and weight. That said, if you smoke, and you can quit, cool, if not, enjoy the heck out of it.
DreadPirate75's picture
Submitted by DreadPirate75 on Tue, 03/06/2007 - 14:17
If it were up to me, personal lifestyle choices would definately have an effect on helath insurance rates and medical expenses. If you smoke (despite all the warnings and facts that it is a detriment to good health), and abuse alcohol or drugs, or despite a having a weight problem you still have KFC on speed dial...then yeah, pay up. Those conditions that are out of your direct control should be covered with minimum premiums, Because if we got rid of all the people that ignore health issues the "real" medical problems can be dealt with for much less.
Devonsangel's picture
Submitted by Devonsangel on Tue, 03/06/2007 - 14:18
Okay C: but should my increased rates pay for that?
CofC's picture
Submitted by CofC on Tue, 03/06/2007 - 14:23
No. I just think smokers get undue crap.
Devonsangel's picture
Submitted by Devonsangel on Tue, 03/06/2007 - 14:26
I understand your point, I used to smoke until I saw what it did to my grandfather.

Join our Universe

Connect with 2o2p