\"Oh wow. did you really just compare homosexuality with Breast feeding?\"\r
==> No, you did That. \r
\r
==> What I said was that each are acts of public display, or exposure if you like, which are out of the norm and not generally accepted in American society proper. Neither display is something I wish to try and explain to a child that cannot comprehend the significance of either act. Their minds simply are not ready for such concepts. To a child, its simply a part that's normally clothed now in the open. Moreover, its in that kids mouth. A curious child may even try to mach it - out of curiousity. Their are numerous cases of children mimicing what they seen mommy and daddy doing - even if they don't understand why they were doing it. Remember playing Dr. or House anyone?\r
\r
==> In my example - of which you'll call I noted as being exaggeration in the first place - A child will see either act and will have a reaction that will impact them psychologically on some scale. They simply are not ready for such sensory input. They cannot process the significance for what it truly is yet.\r
\r
==> Its not sheltering or making something preverse, its doing a parent's job of exposing certain things to them at a certain age. There's a reason why children do not have sex education at k-5 grade.\r
\r
\"I would ask you what cave you just crawled out of, except that if you were a cave man you would realise how important a mother nursing a child is.\"\r
\r
==> And I could ask you several insulting questions, but I won't because it does neither of us any good and I don't wish to get into an illogical debate. So, I'll move on and ignore that last bit.\r
\r
\"So let me get this straight - Telling your daughter about the proper function of a breast would bother you.\"\r
==> Your statement assumes I agree with your premis. First, \"the proper\" intersting choice of words. \r
\r
==> Second, you assume that I'm opposed to telling my daughter about one of the breast's functions. Nursing that is.\r
\r
==> I'll dispose the second first. No, I'm not opposed to telling her about nursing, I'm just opposed to telling them about it before they can comprehend the full scope of its meaning. Further causing curiousity and more questions, all leading back to sexuality is not something I care to expose my daughter to before I feel she's ready for such concepts. I believe I'm fully within my rights to have such a perogative.\r
\r
==> Moving back to your first point, you describe a singular use and function to be proper. You furhter imply that all other uses are therefore improper. Hmm...\r
\r
==> Many women are turned-on by the gentle caress of the bosom, the playful tug of the nipple. Some claim it to be an area of dlectable sensations comprised of one or more errgenous zones. Some would dare say that these are just as proper uses of the breast as feeding. In fact, we can go back to any period in time and yield proof of just that fact. I find it interesting that you feel there is a singular proper use of the breast.\r
\r
\"You would rather have her think that they are only to be played with and showed off and have no real function?\"\r
\r
==> Did you really think this was what I was saying? If so, you've made a grave mistake and misunderstanding in my statement above. No father would wish such things of his daughter. I don't know whether to be offended at your accusation... \r
\r
\"daddy, why am I getting these bumps on my chest?\"\r
\"so that someday some lucky guy can get off by playing with them\"\r
\r
==> ...or appalled at your ignorance here.\r
\r
\"Its not the womens fault that men have become obbsessed with porn, and they cant get their mind out of their pants long enough to realise the real function of a body part. \"\r
\r
==> The real function... hmm... singular expression again. Well, to each his / her own I suppose. \r
\r
==> So, which came first, the baby or the women? One does wonder if the first women was fonded - or enjoyed being fondeled, prior to conception. Perhaps to entice is once use which encourages procreation, after all, if we were not attracted to you all - the race would come to an abrupt end - could it not be that we were hard wired to be attracted to certain jiggles and curves? Could it not be that the same desire you accuse us of was not part of the intended design? Perhaps to stimulate is a second use, so that the women actually has an use for the body part when not nursing, after all - she's probably only nursing for 2-3 years in total out of her life of 80+ years. Seems an awful folly ot have a body part that has a singular purpose for such a short time. then of course, there's the nursing element.\r
\r
\"Just because MEN have sexualised breasts, my child shouldn't have to eat in the nasty public bathroom, or wait the thirty minute drive home.\"\r
\r
==> Wow, there's a couple issues here - none of which I care to get into frankly. Again, you make some assumptions here. Nobody knows whether women first teased or men first were enticed - however, neither have anything to do with where a child eats. You are free to do as you wish, lawfully, within your own home. However, when you are in public, as soon as you infringe upon the rights of others - there are laws of society regional cultures that govern.\r
\r
\"Its people like you that perpetuate this whole view.\"\r
==> Again, you attack. I could say, \"its people like you that affirm my opinion - and further strengthen the majority viewpoint in the US - but where does that get me, nowhere. I'm not hear to insult you. I thought you were looking for conversation on the topic - not an emotional argument. I'm becoming sorry that I responded to your BLOG. I thought you were looking for opposing input and alternate perspectives - perhaps I was mistaken.\r
\r
\"If more people did tell their daughters and their sons about what boobs are really about then this wouldn't be a problem.\"\r
==> Ineresting opinion.\r
\r
\"Instead our children are pumped up by their own parents and the media that sexy is the highest praise, and that big tits (fake, not functional, heaven forbid they sag a little) are something to shoot for.\"\r
==> I know many parents that would take offense to being accused of such nonsense.\r
\r
==> Media and marketing on the other hand are something completely different. Its no secret that sex sells.\r
\r
==> Science also supports us being hard wired to sexual awareness. There are numerous studies that show that the mind is nowhere near as acutely aware of visual stimulation than when viewing the opposite sex if hederosexual, or the same sex when homosexual. That is - on the subconcious level mind you.\r
\r
==> Without going into great detail, there's a scientific sommunity and more than one accreditted study proving there's more to it than the media and parental influences at young ages. However, we are all entitled to our opinions.\r
\r
==> Good day to you.