My Wife Picks Shitty Jobs

S
SoupNazzi

Ok... here's a synopsis:


My wife works for a Private Day Care facility. She started out part-time and then after a year, became full-time.


Last summer, they asked her to teach a Private Kindergarten class at the school (seperate from the normal day-care) as the original teacher was going to be on maternity leave.


They asked her to get her CDL to drive the bus, and gave her a $2 an hour raise to go with the new position.


Things are going really well up to the beginning of February.


My wife has some chronic health conditions. She has Fibromyalgia (which causes constant back pain) and Endometriosis (a female disease). She has never allowed either of these to affect her job or how she has done her job. The Endometriosis had been under control and her back pain was manageable.


However, at the beginning of February, we had to go to the ER because she was experiencing extreme pain in her bowel region. She missed a Monday as we were in the ER and that Tuesday so she could go see her OB-GYN. Basically, her endometriosis had returned with a vengeance.


The following week, she aggravated her back some way and hurt it enough that she missed another 2 days in a row, and a 3rd day the following week to get an injection into her back to help her with the pain.


Following that episode, the Director of the school, and one of the owners of the school met with her, and basically removed her from her position teaching Private Kindergarten.


They didn't do this out of malice, but they felt that the class needed continuity and my wife couldn't provide that while she was having health issues.


Unfortunately, that meant she would have to go back into a position that required her to work more strenuously then the position in the Kindergarten class. This of course only irritated her back even more.


Fast forward to this past Monday.


Wife had the flu, so she called in sick to work.


She calls Monday night to get her schedule for Tuesday. Response: "We don't need you Tuesday."


Tuesday night she calls for her schedule for Wednesday. Response: "We don't need you Wednesday."


She is now listed as a "Sub" teacher and basically has to beg for hours.


I've had it. We need her income, and if they cut 2 days in a row, on top of the day she was sick (they don't get paid sick days) that's a big hit on her paycheck.


Basically, the way I understand The ADA, is that my wife would qualify for protection under The ADA as her health conditions are chronic.


Not only that, but she never requested accomadations from her employer, yet they altered her workload anyways.


From what I have read about the ADA, this would violate the "Regarded As" Standard.


I.e. -
Quote:
In other cases, employers have altered the workload of employees who they mistakenly believed to have HIV or high blood pressure without a request for accommodation from the employee. This is called the “regarded as” standard and is well settled in this area of law. Employers need to beware of making accommodations for employees who have not requested it. Although the federal law is designed to be a “clear and comprehensive national mandate for the elimination of discrimination against people with disabilities”, in practice, it poses much confusion for employees and employers, as well as the courts.


Granted, my wife doesn't have HIV, but her conditions are on the same level as high blood pressure and are just as chronic.


Not only that, but she has asked them (indirectly) to accommodate her in her new "position" which, they patently seem to ignore.


So, I guess I am wondering if this is worth pursuing legally.


My wife would prefer not to, as she has decided to get certified to teach in a real school, and needs letters of recommendation.


However, I still would like to confront these people after she has secured such letters, if only to let them know that they fucked up.






 Playboys or Guns - Tough Decision


View Image


Eks Gets a Tattoo of his Car


View Image


The Clock is Ticking


View Image


I can Support This


View Image


Canadian Girl


View Image


You Talking To Me?


View Image


RedNeck Plumbing


View Image


France's Golden Girl


View Image


HeadOn - Apply Directly to the Forehead


View Image


LB Starts His Kids Out Young


View Image


Smoking Starts Young


View Image


Things Are Looking Up


View Image


F1R3 Begins Training


View Image


Tweety Has a Camel Toe


View Image


 




 


Guess the Celeb


Last Answer - Hillary Swank


Today - DD = -1


View Image


View Image


 

Comments (6)

C
CofC·
Dude, it say Kristen Bell on the photo. And, I am a Veronica Mar's fan/creep.\r \r Sorry, to hear about your wife. The ADA may only apply to employers of a certain size. Not 300 pounds, but over 25, to 50 in number.
J
JollyRoger·
Dude, of all the cars to get a tatoo of too, a Chevy Cavalier? ROFL\r
S
SoupNazzi·
A. The title I employment provisions apply to private employers, State and local governments, employment agencies, and labor unions. Employers with 25 or more employees are covered as of July 26, 1992. Employers with 15 or more employees will be covered two years later, beginning July 26, 1994.\r \r Her place of employment easily has 15+ employees.
L
LuxDraconis·
Kristen Bell, Damn it says it at the bottom of the photo. Sorry to hear about the shit you and your wife are going through with her work.
T
TANK·
Maybe your wife qualifies for disability now that her illness has come back. Should look into that. Thenshe wouldn't need to work at all.
A
Azuredreams·
It's a bad situation for both your wife and her employer. They need someone that they know will be able to show up for work more often than not. She needs a place of work that can be more flexable about her work hours when she is having flare ups.\r \r I would suggest talking to a lawyer, it's free and they are usually more than happy to give a consultation. Regretfully however I do not think that much can be done in this case, I doubt that your wife's conditions will be able to force her employer's hand or garner a long term disability settlement. \r \r Fibro is still very new and has no real labrotory diagnosis so most insurance companies deny it even exsists. As for Endometriosis,i've only ever heard of someone getting short term disability for it, after a laparoscopic surgery or hysterectomy.