Economics

webmonkee

Shared on Sat, 03/11/2006 - 20:27
Ive recently read two books by by Thomas Sowell, an economist.  Although that may sound like an awful way to spend time, his books are actually very approachable.

Whats really interesting is the way he explains how some things work quite the opposite of how you expect them to work.

For example, take Rent Control.  Now, on the surface, it would seem that rent control would gaurentee cheap rentals for everyone.  But, thats not what happens.  In fact, the cities that have rent control, such as New York, tend to have the highest average rental prices around.  Now, you might argue that New York is expensive because it is New York, and there is some truth to that, BUT.....

Sowells point is that there are literally thousands upon thousands of completely empty apartments in vacant buildings in New York.  In fact, there are more vacant apartments than there are homeless people in New York.

Why so many?  Why do they become abandoned apartment buildings?  Isnt Real Estate a money-maker?  Sowell says it depends.

Imagine you own an apartment building.  You charge what the market will support.  In other words, you charge the highest amount you can charge that will still allow you to keep every apartment filled.

You do plenty of maintenance and upkeep.  If you dont, people may move.  If too many move, youll have to raise rents to maintain your margins, and more may move out.  So, you keep the aprtments well-maintained, and you charge what the market will support.

Along comes Rent Control.  Now you can only charge what the law says you can charge - no more.  At some point, you COULD charge more for the aprtment, because the market would support it, but you CANT because the law says you cant.  However, the Rent Control law does not keep a cap on the cost of the materials you need to buy in order to keep your property maintained.

So, over time, you start skimping on maintenance.  Some tenants notice the skimping, dont like it and leave.  Others stay because the rent is cheap.  A few new people move in because the rent is cheap.

You continue this slide for awhile.  At some point, a major expense comes up that City Code compels you to fix.  The City Code sees no disparity between requiring you to spend money on your property, while not allowing you to pass that cost onto your tenants.

Maybe you pay the first big expense.  At some point though, you realize its no longer financially sound to keep pumping money into the apartment building.  You might close it and evict everyone, but its just as likely that you simply leave town.  Your building eventually becomes abandoned.

The point of Sowells books is that Free Markets work and legislating them does not.

If you have never read an econnomics book, I highly recommend Basic Economics by Thomas Sowell.  I personally feel it should be required reading for anyone who wants to vote. 

Comments

Sanj's picture
Submitted by Sanj on Mon, 03/13/2006 - 05:25
Nice post webmonkee, I think Ill try and get my hands on one of those books, sounds like an interesting read.
Cranefolder's picture
Submitted by Cranefolder on Mon, 03/13/2006 - 08:45
Another great book is called "Naked Economics".  It is a very easy read and uses lots of real-world examples to help you get a grasp on concepts that are normally presented in a very boring, abstract and difficult to comprehend manner.  I really loved this book and it also points out that a lot of things that people think are economically beneficial are actually counterproductive because they havent thought of all of the unintended consequences.  There is a really good chapter about the effects of public and private information on economic policy.  Its a great read and an easy one.  Im going to check out the book you read because I really got fascinated by this stuff after reading "Naked Economics".  Thanks for the recommendation.
vinnie2k's picture
Submitted by vinnie2k on Mon, 03/13/2006 - 08:45
Very skewed logic. Free markets do not exist. And wont. Ever. Economical agents arent perfect, and competition isnt either. So the mathematical model behind that logic is just wrong. So before jumping to conclusions on free market, maybe M. Sewell should try a few examples where rent control actually works.
webmonkee's picture
Submitted by webmonkee on Mon, 03/13/2006 - 14:10
Hmm, well, Ill say, how are we defining that Rent Control EVER works?  From whos point of view?  Actually, Sowell would agree that there are no Free Markets.  He actually says that he thinks it is good there are certain checks and  balances in most economies.  His intent is to demonstrate that those who throw their full support behind concepts without spending the time to follow their potential long-term outcomes, will often be puzzled by the results they get and will rarely see the connection between the policy they agreed with and their present state of dismay.My condensed version of one of his points above does not do it justice at all.  I used it simply to illustrate one of the topics he made me think about.Whether you agree or disagree with his point of view, I still recommend his books.  They will make you think for sure.If anyone does read the book, let me know.  Id be interested to hear your take.

Join our Universe

Connect with 2o2p