feauturing article

Warner wants more money for music in video games

by BalekFekete| Published: Thursday, August 07 @ 16:07:30 EDT

Artists on Warner Music labels beware because Edgar Bronfman, Jr. is cutting off your feet at the ankles.

As reported over on Reuters, the Chairman and CEO feels that:

"The amount being paid to the music industry, even though their games are entirely dependent on the content we own and control, is far too small"

Would anybody who thinks back to 2005 ever think that the market for rhythm-based instrument games would have grown to the beast it is today? I certainly would not have. So it's not surprising that the record labels would have dismissed this as a passing fad as well, and therefore not aggressively developed the contracts in place for favorable pricing and licensing agreements. It's not even surprising that they are all a little put off today, with the explosion of Rock Band and the millions of songs downloaded by gamers worldwide.

What is surprising is the lack of understanding and value placed upon the marketing power these games provide. These micro transactions, while significant when taken over the course of thousands of downloads, still pale in comparison to the value a band receives from this type of exposure to such a wide and diverse fan base. I wouldn't have a clue who The Outlaws or Dragonforce were if these games did not exist. Now songs from these bands grace my iPod.

When I drive home from work, what music do you think I hear on the largest rock radio station in Philadelphia? The vast majority of songs played are right off of the Rock Band soundtrack. Coincidence? I think not. The radio stations are in tune to the idea that these games drive the tastes of their listeners, and are catering to them. To quote the Guinness commercial - "BRILLIANT!"

However, now we have a record label that is planning to alienate these fans by charging a premium over other labels. Great going Mr. Bronfman - I hope you enjoy your premium Marketplace costs and the dramatically reduced downloads they'll earn you. To the bands of Warner Music labels...I wish I got to know you.

find more news

reader comments

Sponsored Links


Reader Comments

Untitled (Score: 1)
Posted By JonahFalcon on Thursday, August 07 @ 17:30:31 EDT
(Members Homepage | Send a Message)
"rythem-based"

Rhythm.

Artists' rights are important to me, so I really can't comment.


Death to spell checkers (Score: 1)
Posted By BalekFekete on Thursday, August 07 @ 23:41:48 EDT
(Members Homepage | Send a Message)
Where's the quality? Meh. :/




Artists' rights (Score: 1)
Posted By BrokenDesign on Saturday, August 09 @ 17:59:38 EDT
(Members Homepage | Send a Message)
You're correct, artists' rights are very important, but how much of the premium Warner is planning to charge will go to these artists? Absolutely none. They'll get whatever they currently get and Warner, et al, will pocket any additional revenue from the downloads. As is previously stated, record labels don't have a clue of how to handle the new day in age where you can buy something online and have it delivered to you in a matter of seconds. Instead of embracing it and working to try and use it to their advantage in a way that's mutually beneficial to everyone, they do all they can to make the price skyrocket. They figure that since people are so used to going all the way to the store to get the album they can essentially tack on a "convenience fee" and make a killing since they don't have things such as the packaging and printing to foot the bill for. Hopefully someday it will bite them in the ass, but given consumers these days I wouldn't doubt that Warner gets their way, prices on their music go up for GH / RB track purchases and people still pay the fee to get the songs, grumbling the whole time but not actually speaking with their wallet and refusing to pay just because those extortionists figure they can make a few extra bucks per song. I still remember the outrage of people when they found out it was going to be $2 per song for GH DLC, yet they all still paid for it, and now it's the norm. That's exactly what will happen when songs are released at $4 each from Warner. They'll pay and then other companies will think "Hey, why am I missing out on all this extra money?" and they'll up the prices of their music too. And I'll be there to say way to go, consumer, for allowing and damn near encouraging such things to happen.





Untitled (Score: 1)
Posted By Azuredreams on Thursday, August 07 @ 21:28:14 EDT
(Members Homepage | Send a Message)
Fuck em'. The mere fact that we the consumer must pay any after market costs for content is absurd. Rock Band 2 is going to cost us the consumer 180 right out of the gate, that doesn't factor in the accessories, such as rechargable battery packs, drum silencers etc.

The artists are not the ones who make most of the money, it is the studios....just like it has always been.Yet the artists get plenty.When's the last time you saw Zepplin or AC DC pan handling?

If Warner Bros is so damn concerned about their artists pockets, perhaps they should pay them a bit better.


Untitled (Score: 1)
Posted By JonahFalcon on Thursday, August 07 @ 23:34:26 EDT
(Members Homepage | Send a Message)
You know how much something is worth?

The amount people are willing to pay for it.

If it's too costly, people won't buy it.




So much for not commenting (Score: 1)
Posted By BalekFekete on Thursday, August 07 @ 23:43:57 EDT
(Members Homepage | Send a Message)
But you are right. The value of the packs is what the market will bear. However, if I see a $3-a-song pack from Warner next to one from another studio at $2-a-song, that will be enough for me to not purchase. Enough follow suit and your market will have spoken.




How can you have any pudding if you dont eat your meat?! (Score: 1)
Posted By Armada99 on Friday, August 08 @ 01:28:12 EDT
(Members Homepage | Send a Message)
And it better be the baddest fucking song EVER for me to pay $3/song. So..I cant even think of a song I would consider the baddest fucking song EVER.

I'll freely admit I dont think I should have paid what I have paid for some songs, but overall I think its worked out pretty even. Got a few songs I like for 80 pts, and some really shitty ones for 160. Even steven.




Untitled (Score: 1)
Posted By JonahFalcon on Friday, August 08 @ 03:55:48 EDT
(Members Homepage | Send a Message)
It's not going to happen when songs are $1 each on iTunes.





Untitled (Score: 1)
Posted By eboy71 on Friday, August 08 @ 20:49:40 EDT
(Members Homepage | Send a Message)
For the past 10 or so years, the record companies have demonstrated that they don't have a single clue as to how to handle the Internet or digital distribution. This is just the most recent example.



The comments are owned by the poster. We aren't responsible for their content.
No Comments Allowed for Anonymous, please register

advertising

Community Spotlight

keep us online!

Active Clans

HaloTards: Halo 3 clan all about fun for players new to the franchise who are interested in some private, friendly, no-pressure multiplayer and co-op sessions.
Digital Violence: A smaller, tight knit clan focused on team gaming, no cheating, and plenty of ruthless killing. Basically, we are pursuing quality over quantity.
2old4Forzatoo: 2old4Forzatoo is a clan dedicated to all aspects of forza motorsport 2
2old2resist: More of a community then a clan. A group of casual gamers who enjoy the social aspects of gaming while playing many PS3 games together. No politics,

2old2play podcast